sabato, Luglio 27, 2024

No protective effect of alcohol on human health: yet another warning to fight the alcoholism bane

Alcoholism represents a real scourge for the United States and both scientific research and active prevention make considerable efforts to understand its causes and avoid the very serious clinical and social consequences deriving from this aberrant practice. The proposition that low levels of alcohol consumption, on the other hand, might provide health benefits and protection against all-cause mortality has been highly controversial. Observational studies and various meta-analyses have reported that individuals who consume moderate amounts of alcohol live longer and have a lower probability of heart disease as compared to individuals who abstain from alcohol consumption. However, there is evidence that these findings are a result of systematic biases, such as the use of health indicators that are not associated with alcohol consumption, including diet, dental hygiene, income, and weight.

Other biases include the failure to differentiate between complete abstainers and former drinkers and the possibility that abstainers might have poor health from other causes. Two previous meta-analyses by the same team of researchers found that when potential confounding variables and biases were accounted for, low levels of alcohol consumption were not associated with any reduction in mortality risk. However, the authors believe that with the emergence of newer, more recent studies, this association needs to be re-investigated. In a new study, the researchers conducted a systematic review of studies published until July 2021 and performed a meta-analysis to determine associations between alcohol consumption and the risk of all-cause mortality. Furthermore, the analysis also investigated the association between all-cause mortality risk and alcohol consumption according to median ages and the sex distribution in the study population.

To minimize the bias associated with lifetime selection, the researchers studied cohorts consisting of individuals recruited before the age of 51 years and followed up till a minimum median age of 60 years. To eliminate the bias of ill health associated with alcohol abstainers, the analysis included occasional drinkers — individuals that have less than one drink a week — as a comparison. The results reported that low levels of alcohol consumption (less than 25 g per day) were not associated with reductions in all-cause mortality risks for either of the sexes. However, the all-cause mortality risk was significantly higher for females who consumed more than 25 g of alcohol a day and males who drank more than 45 g of alcohol each day. After accounting for potential biases and confounding effects, low-volume consumption of alcohol was not found to grant any protective benefits such as a reduced all-cause mortality risk.

The systematic review found that errors involving the misclassification of former or occasional drinkers as abstainers were quite common, with 86 out of the 107 studies having such errors.The investigation also found that biases in classifying abstainers and other characteristics of the study altered the relationship between all-cause mortality risk and alcohol consumption, with the controls from most studies attenuating the possible protective effects of alcohol consumption at low volumes or increasing the risks of alcohol consumption. Furthermore, the use of occasional drinkers as the reference group also resulted in non-significant protective effects of low-volume alcohol consumption as compared to using non-drinkers as the reference group, which reported significant protective effects of low levels of alcohol use. In the fully adjusted meta-analysis models, for female drinkers the risk was significantly larger than that for female alcohol abstainers.

Overall, the findings indicated that when all biases and potential confounders were accounted for, low levels of alcohol consumption did not provide any protective effects against all-cause mortality risk. It should be noted that there are no references to the types of alcoholic beverages in the study. Grappa and spirits may not confer any health benefits, but very small amounts of dark wines and beer do contribute polyphenols that may have some biological and health effect.

Zhao, J. et al. (2023) “Association Between Daily Alcohol Intake and Risk of All-Cause Mortality”, JAMA Network Open, 6(3), p. e236185. d

Latest

Newsletter

Don't miss

Dott. Gianfrancesco Cormaci
Dott. Gianfrancesco Cormaci
Laurea in Medicina e Chirurgia nel 1998, specialista in Biochimica Clinica dal 2002, ha conseguito dottorato in Neurobiologia nel 2006. Ex-ricercatore, ha trascorso 5 anni negli USA alle dipendenze dell' NIH/NIDA e poi della Johns Hopkins University. Guardia medica presso la casa di Cura Sant'Agata a Catania. In libera professione, si occupa di Medicina Preventiva personalizzata e intolleranze alimentari. Detentore di un brevetto per la fabbricazione di sfarinati gluten-free a partire da regolare farina di grano. Responsabile della sezione R&D della CoFood s.r.l. per la ricerca e sviluppo di nuovi prodotti alimentari, inclusi quelli a fini medici speciali.

“Le sostanze chimiche fanno male” o chemofobia: un’analisi veloce di un tema attuale ma celato

La chemofobia è la paura irrazionale verso composti o ingredienti percepiti come sintetici o innaturali. La maggior parte delle persone usa la parola "chimica"...

Troppo sale a tavola: attenti al rischio autoimmunità, le prove ci sono

L’incidenza e la prevalenza delle malattie autoimmuni sono aumentate nei paesi occidentali negli ultimi dieci anni. La patogenesi di questi disturbi è multifattoriale, con...

Vaccinazioni contro influenza ed herpes: perchè proteggono dall’attacco del COVID?

Non è completamente chiaro se la coinfezione con un altro patogeno possa avere un impatto sulla gravità del COVID-19. È stato riportato in studi...

Questo si chiuderà in 20 secondi